Evidence of Obama’s Socialist Connections

by LukeAmerica2020
While America trembles precariously close to the economic fringes of outright socialism, we have precious few hours to resolutely return to the valiant ideals of our founding fathers. Aside from political party planks and moral belief systems, our choices are between a man of character whose history is an open book of sacrifice and service AND one who is replete with ongoing discoveries of connections to nefarious associates coupled stunningly with his blatant refusal to reveal any documentation regarding his past.

As you read these words, I earnestly declare to you that I will not be taken quietly into that unfathomable morass of socialistic revolution by Barack Hussein Obama and his cunning puppetmasters. No; I will not go quietly. I will not disgrace the precious history of our venerable forefathers; I will not dishonor the blood that was proudly shed by so many Americans who came before me.

Over the illustrious course of an eventful 232 years, each generation of our great country has climbed the shoulders of the brave men and women who came before us. Each generation striving to leave a culture and a people better than when we first took breath, we are the pinnacle of all those who came before us. We must not permit one moment longer for their memories to be flagrantly besmirched by the enemies from within whose fervent objective is to “change” us into an economic and social system that wholeheartedly aims to deny us the freedoms we hold dear.

Mr. Obama promises to take our hard-earned money from us and spread it around to those who have not earned it and who do not deserve it. This millionaire with super-wealthy financiers claims that WE are selfish for not patriotically donating more taxes to his ever-expanding government. This man, as many recently discovered, assures us that he will bankrupt our country’s coal mine industry. This man with a carefully concealed past, charges that we Average Joe’s can not intellectually grasp the nuances of HIS ‘hope’ because we cling to our guns and our religion.

This man pledges to obliterate conservative talk radio and television with a doctrine that he labels as fairness. This man insists that he will defund and disarm our national military while simultaneously pontificating that he will rise up his own personal army of civilian security forces. This man, if elected, will most certainly appoint federal and Supreme court judges that share his contemptible belief system. This man, if elected, will preside with like-minded majorities in the Senate and the House. This man, if elected, will be beyond the letter and the spirit of the law. This man, if elected, will have in effect attained the status of a dictator … a socialist dictator determined to ‘change’ our country for all future generations into an economy and into a society that none before our generation would recognize as the home of the American Dream.

It is with these concerns in mind that I asseverate to you that this man is the embodiment and concoction of long years of patient grooming by an older generation of radical leftists. I declare to you, my fellow Americans, that this man has secrets few dare to expose. Today, you are about to discover for yourself one more of his concealed entanglements. By perusing the heretofore obscure documentary evidence you will have another glimpse into the darkness of character that is Barack Hussein Obama.

The Cover-up …
Earlier this year, sources released information that during his campaign for the State Senate in Illinois, Barack Obama was endorsed by an organization known as the Chicago “New Party”. The New Party was a political party established by the quasi-Marxist Democratic Socialists of America (the DSA) to espouse the socialist principles of the DSA while focusing on winnable elections at a local level and spreading the Socialist movement upwards.

It was an attempt to regroup the forces on the extreme left in a new strategy to take power from the Democrat party. The admittedly Socialist Organization experienced a moderate rise in numbers in the late 1990’s.

The Obama campaign along with the remnants of the New Party and Democratic Socialists of America claimed that Obama was never a member of either organization. The DSA and the New Party then systematically attempted to cover up any ties between Obama and the Socialist Organizations. However, it now appears that Barack Obama was indeed a certified and acknowledged member of the DSA’s New Party.

The Discovery …
A short while ago, a political blogger discovered a web page that had been scrubbed from the New Party’s website. The web page which was published in October 1996, was an internet newsletter update on that year’s congressional races. Although the web page was deleted from the New Party’s website, the non-profit Internet Archive Organization had archived the page.

The New Party had hoped to implement Socialist Rule in the United States and was established to counteract the influence of a Democratic Party that they viewed as too moderate and too centered. Now it seems that almost 10 years after the socialist party fell apart, their strategy of upward growth has reached the White House. Obama’s ties to the DSA’s New Party is beyond just an association … it is outright membership, as clearly defined by the party’s August 1996 newsletter, in an outright Socialist organization.

The Evidence …
In addition to the scanned images below, you can visit the related reference sites for more documents.

These are the first two pages of the New Party News Spring 1996. This is not about someone else named Barack Obama who happened to also live in Chicago at the same time. As you will see, this is photographic evidence. These pages prove that Barack Obama was a member of the Illinois New Party and was endorsed by them in his 1996 Illinois State Senate race.

Click each image to view an enlargement.

Here is the front page scanned from a photocopy.

Here is a close up scan of the same front page. Note that the text refers to Barack Obama as a New Party member, while Willie Delgado is only “NP endorsed”.

Here is page 2 scanned from a photocopy.

Here is a close up scan of the original page 2.

 
Final Thoughts …
Now, you’re starting to discover why Mr. Obama is so adamant about not disclosing any documents from his past. There are certainly more secrets … more information about his hidden past … to be revealed. So, before you cast your vote tomorrow, ponder for a moment … why … why has he utterly refused to release any of the following information. Just what IS he hiding from us?

Many of these documents and records are relevant. Most of these documents and records SHOULD be relatively innocuous. However, Barack Hussein Obama and his campaign continue to stonewall all requests.

Document Status
Occidental College records not released
Columbia College records not released
Columbia Thesis paper “not available”
Harvard College records not released
Selective Service Registration not released
Medical records not released
Illinois State Senate records “not available”
Illinois State Senate schedule “not available”
letters from lobbyists not released
Law Practice client list not released
Law Practice billing records not released
Harvard Law Review articles published none
University of Chicago scholarly articles none
Chicago Annenburg Challenge documents blocked access
names of capaign donors giving $200 or less not released
Full Disclosure of all info on Barry Soetoro not released
Certified Copy of Original Birth Certificate not released
Embossed, signed paper COLB not released
Disclosure of Kenyan citizenship not released
Disclosure of Indonesian dual citizenship not released

WHEN is Barak “I will bring transparency back to government” Obama going make his RELEVANT records public?

 

Who do YOU want as our next President?

 
Related References …

    American Thinker

    Killing Time

    Politically Drunk

    WorldNetDaily

 


If you enjoyed this post, PLEASE VOTE for it by pressing
the DIGG button. Then, on the page that opens, click the
“digg it” button on the left side to vote on it. THANKS.

Advertisements

29 Responses to Evidence of Obama’s Socialist Connections

  1. sfokc6125 says:

    SPREAD THIS:

    Homeland Security is hoping for McCain to win. I have proof of that .
    If you are in the coal mining bizz then vote McCain because Obama has you in his sights to shut you down. PA needs to remember what happened when the steel plant shut down. How many ghost town will Obamas make. If it wasnt for company’s like Phoenix Glass that part of PA would have gone out . You dont kill jobs ,You dont raise taxes and spend more on a weak dollar. YOU CUT TAXES YOU SPEND LESS AND YOU KEEP AMERICANS WORKING. Coal drilling whats next Walmart . Sorry you have too much , What happens to the real people that work in these places. What happens to your city ? . You dont KILL JOBS THAT KILLS THE ECONOMY

  2. K McGough says:

    I hope Hannity is aware of this!! He seems like the only honest media person willing to tell the facts like they are!! Why hasn’t this and other revolting info on Obama been released earlier?? I fear it may be too late to wake up enough Americans to stop this socialist-communist from his devestating plan!!

  3. Ed Darrell says:

    How about for McCain?

    Not released:
    Birth Certificate
    Selective Service Registration
    College transcripts (any of them)
    Medical Records
    Congressional records
    Senate records
    U.S. Senate schedule
    U.S. House of Representatives schedule
    Letters from lobbyists
    Records from his days as a lobbyist for the world’s largest weapons purchaser (the DOD)
    Hotel records for trips on government money to schmooze elected officials (it was on one of these trips that he started his extramarital affair that ended his first marriage)
    Any law review articles published
    Any newspaper articles published (what, are you daft? This stuff is available in the library — but, if you claim it’s a problem for Obama, of course it’s a double problem for McCain)
    Records of dealings with Prof. Khalid (McCain raised nearly $500,000 for this Palestinian’s project — Obama had tea with him, McCain put him in business. Sauce for the goose, sauce for the gander)
    Full disclosure of birth certificate (difficult, since he was born in a foreign nation!)
    Certified copy of original birth certificate
    Disclosure of Kenyan citizenship
    Disclosure of Indonesion citizenship (no, McCain doesn’t have them, but neither does Obama. Goose, gander)
    Disclosure of all meetings with Charles Keating (only the meetings with other senators were divulged in the ethics investigation, where McCain was admonished for his ethical lapses)

    Does this list look silly yet? It can’t begin to be as silly as the list you’ve got for Obama. Are you really so library-challenged that you can’t find the Harvard Law Review?

    Nuts.

  4. Linda says:

    I saw these referenced articles two weeks ago and sent it to over 100 news organizations. They don’t seem to care or they just refuse to report it. The only reason I can think of for this is that they, too, are behind this movement.

    They control the media. I don’t know how you can begin to convince all those people like the ones I just saw dancing in an “all my problems are solved” drunk dance.

  5. Linda says:

    I sent it to Hannity and most others at FOX. No one reported a word of it. I sent the copies of the referenced articles along with the pictures and everything.

    Maybe if more people send it they might cover the story.

  6. Linda and K McGough, I hear from reliable sources that Hannity, other FoxNews commentators, and several state and federal elected officials have read this post.

    As astonished as you and others are, we can only speculate as to why neither the original discovery nor this updated story have been revealed by the MSM and by FoxNews.

    Nonetheless, Obama has won the election and we must come together as Americans … despite our sincere concerns about the numerous unresolved issues regarding his obscure history. Moreover, we should certainly remain vigilant while striving to muster the courage to hope that he will lead our great nation in the right direction.

    Finally, as stated above, I will not go quietly. At the grassroots level, we MUST work diligently to take back the House and the Senate in 2010. And, we MUST take back the Presidency in 2012. Meanwhile, our new President will deserve the honor and respect of the office. Our country faces many challenges. He may pleasantly surprise us…

  7. Deb in Indiana says:

    Luke America

    How could you quit now? Dont stop! Push harder to get the truth out. If they dont listen to the letters, emails and calls, maybe it is time to stand outside of tv and radio stations with signs. We cant leave this guy who is fighting for the truth on his own. That happens way too many times. This is insane that we have to think of other ways to get a story out, that is being jammed by the media!! Who is running this country. They are! They choose the stories, and then press for action, and comment on everything, in the format they want you to digest it.

    Regroup Luke, go to the next level, and pick up the fight again, as long as it takes!

  8. Deb in Indiana, I have not … nor do I intend to quit. Our grave concerns regarding this man of mystery notwithstanding, we must respect the office of the Presidency.

    Moreover, it is my steadfast resolve to not only honor the office, but also, to attempt to articulately voice our concerns in the arena of ideas … to research and report discoveries regarding his obscure history … and, to actively assist others who are in favor of lower taxes, smaller government, and a strong national defense.

  9. Angie says:

    We must work continually to get truth out. We need someone to organize our efforts. They heard the people on the bail out. They heard us about secure borders. They heard about drilling now. We need massive calls, emails, faxes, letters, at the same time until their phone lines jam. Until they are deaf from our noise. Perhaps we need a million ‘person’ march on Washington. LOL!

    Thanks for this link. I will get it out. I found some time ago that he courted the Chicago Socialist party in the 90’s and their support of him. I had not seen these papers. Thanks, I have no faith in the Media getting the truth out. Hannity did his expose of Obama before the election but I do not recall this. I cannot imagine why he would not have used it. He brought out more than the others have. Most of his dubious connections, and questions.

    I agree we must respect the office. We must try to bring truth to others and exercise our rights in a civil manner. What will his first 100 days be like? Will it be the Fairness doctrine? The Freedom Act? Cut National Defense? Raise taxes? Who knows, but I am afraid we are in for a rough ride.

  10. the banks were nationalized. let it go.

  11. Ed Darrell says:

    What will his first 100 days be like? Will it be the Fairness doctrine? The Freedom Act? Cut National Defense? Raise taxes? Who knows, but I am afraid we are in for a rough ride.

    You might start with the campaign positions he articulated at his campaign website. Temper that with the astounding economic collapse we’re trying to avoid.

    Fairness Doctrine is way down the line, unlikely to be subject to administration pressure (the FCC commissioners serve terms — it’s an independent agency). Cut national defense? Are you kidding? There’s nothing like that in any of the campaign materials. He’s talking about going after al Quaeda hammer and tong.

    Raise taxes? If you make more than $250,000 a year, perhaps — but we all should sacrifice if we’re serious about saving our retirement funds, serious about winning the fight against bin Laden, and serious about saving our nation.

    Certainly there’s nothing there you want to give away, is there?

  12. NetherLands says:

    National Review did comment on Obama’s membership of The New Party, yet litlle too late. It’s too complicated for the couch-potatoe crowd.
    Michael Moore – who himself campaigned in 1996 for The New Party ( http://web.archive.org/web/20010306032143/www.newparty.org/up9609.html ) pointed out that Obama is/was the most liberal Senator, as did watch-dog organisations etc. a long time ago. Still, ‘he’s a uniter’ (of assorted radicals and riff-raff but hey)
    The problem?
    Americans have embraced a Third World-voting system (rampant voter-registration problems, inane non-existing photo-ID requirements, caucus-idiocy, weeks to vote iso more polling stations, to name a few) and energized the Jerry-Springer/Jack-Ass crowd to vote:
    People that believe in the Fallacy of Omnipotence regarding the POTUS – ‘Bush Bad’ ‘Obama Good’ even when their daily situation is more affected by their local officials;
    People who think ‘Obama will put gas in my tank’ – even when higher taxes on corporations just means a higher price at the pump;
    People that claim they don’t want corruption – so they re-elect types like Stevens;
    People that claim they want to be taken seriously by their officials – so they re-elect types like ‘my constituents are racists’ Murtha;
    People that claim they want a moderate bi-partisan President – so they elect someone who has, to put it mildly, a social circle filled with rabid radicals and an astonishing ideological bias (e.g. raise Capital Gains Taxes – even when it’s historical scientific fact that that reduces the net gains – because ‘it’s fair’;, bankrupt coal plants because it’s ‘good for the environment’; vote REPEATEDLY against Born Alive bills because ‘babies are punishment’; attack unilateraly on allied Pakistani soil to ‘defeat’ Osama Bin-boogeyman)’;
    People that consider a personal constantly morphing internet-page as a good source on information on a pandering candidate’s platform instead of their voting records, accomplishments and other public sources;
    People that put as much time in researching JUST TWO candidates (hell we have 15 different parties each election cycle!) as POTUS as they put in their ‘American Idols’ decision;
    People that complain about corrupt officials – so they put Patrick Fitzgerald in jeopardy by voting in the corrupt Chicago machine;
    People that don’t realise platforms can change at will but character can not.

    ‘Uneducated’ people like, you know, people who handle money for their living, reacted to the news of the Obama win with the predictable 400 point DROP on the Dow-Jones as a result. These ‘uneducated’ people understood that more taxation during an economic downtime isn’t ‘fair’, it’s moronic.

    The Obama-win isn’t historic. Obama spent almost four times as much as the qualified moderate guy with the right record, Obama won the Presidency. Wow, capitalism works no matter creed or color. What a suprise.

    Obama Bought The Presidency

    (and say hi to his derelict brother and illegal auntie whose keeper he is – or not, judging from ‘distractions’ like his actual actions)

  13. rich58 says:

    How can he qualify for a govt job if he has been a member of a communist organization…He couldnt pass an FBI background check to work in housekeeping at a VA Hospital…I smell communism comming right down the middle of pennsilvania ave…Lead by the left-wing liberal press…

  14. GeekGirl2u says:

    rich58 I asked the same question so many times. How could Obama get elected having to go through an FBI background check. My brother in-law answered my question …… he said the FBI answers to the Democrats.

    Obama’s untested Achilles heel is his relationship with three men — Tony Rezko, William Ayers, and Rashid Khalidi. These names will become shorthand for Corruption, Terrorism, and the Destruction of Israel… Unfortunately, the worshipful, servile attitude of many Democrats and media personalities so far has hindered a tough look at Obama’s friends and associates and his judgment. But that will come. What should concern Democrats keen on taking back the White House is whether or not these issues will be fully vetted before Obama is installed as the next President.

  15. Ed Darrell says:

    My brother in-law answered my question …… he said the FBI answers to the Democrats.

    So, your brother in-law flunked high school civics? Your brother in-law can’t read the Constitution? Or your brother in-law is crazy as a loon?

    The FBI has a director who serves for a term certain — 10 years. The FBI is part of the Justice Department (which has been controlled by Republicans these past 8 years), but is an independent agency in Justice. Not even the president can fire the FBI director. (See here: http://www.fbi.gov/priorities/priorities.htm )

    Obama has no significant relationship with any of the three men. With Ayers, there never was any significant relationship — more like a guy you served on a PTA board with. Obama’s relationship with Khalidi is this: Obama beat John McCain, who raised more than $400,000 to finance Khalidi’s work overseas. Rezko is long past. If there had been any meat to those allegations, reporters probably would have dug it up — too delicious not to.

    The gullible, anti-reality attitude of internet tinfoil hat brigades keeps trying to draw connections where no connections exist.

    Democrats controlling the FBI? Yeah, and I got a mountain called Rushmore, and for just $57,000 I can get your face carved on it.

  16. Ed Darrell says:

    Obama has survived the toughest security checks possible, already, to get where he is: A U.S. senator who sits on the Foreign Relations Committee.

    Get over it. Obama won. The rest of the world thinks it’s great. What sort of depressives are y’all taking?

  17. Ed Darrell, Fairness Doctrine coming June 2009 or sooner with Obama’s selection of Henry Rivera for his FCC transition advisor. Rivera will swing the FCC vote to 3-2 in favor of ending conservative and christian radio.

    Regarding our economy … to me, it’s up for grabs just who will shove us over the cliff first … Bush-backed bailouts, congressional bailouts, Obama handouts, or congressional handouts. Future generations will look back in utter disgust at our current and upcoming government unless they STOP repeating the SAME mistakes that caused the Great Depression of ’29.

    Cutting our national defense … maybe you need to hear Obama tell you himself. The following video is Obama … not a consummate imposter … telling us that he intends to defund and disarm our military particularly including technological advances.

    Regarding tax cuts (alias taking from the financially succesful and donating the spoils to the less fortunate) … Obama started at 250K … then he lowered it to 200K … then Biden lowered it to 150K. But, let me ASSURE you that when you impose greater taxes on those who own businesses and the businesses themselves, two ordeals will unfold FORTHWITH. First, they will increase prices to the end-consumer for their products and services. Second, they will lay off employees to balance the books.

    In short, taking from the rich and giving to the poor may sound good on the surface. But, the reality is that the rich WILL survive while the higher prices and increased unemployment will cost FAR MORE than the stipends wrenched from the grip of the wealthy.

  18. Ed Darrell, perhaps before you quaff your next big gulp of Obamalicious Kool-Aid, you could share with us the unbiased links online which validate that Obama was, in fact, vetted by the FBI. And, if you could be ever so kind as to share with … us here unlearnt right-wing nutjobs a clingin’ to our guns and bibles … what was Mr. Obama’s security clearance level before his candidacy announcement? What is it now? Keep it simple for us; we don’t have your laudable predilection for erudite study … ooops … i mean we’s not as smart and educated as you are in your brilliant nuanced insights.

  19. Ed Darrell says:

    Ed Darrell, Fairness Doctrine coming June 2009 or sooner with Obama’s selection of Henry Rivera for his FCC transition advisor. Rivera will swing the FCC vote to 3-2 in favor of ending conservative and christian radio.

    The transition team can’t speed vacancies at the FCC. FCC is an independent agency, with commissioners serving set terms of five years. Rivera has not been appointed to a term, and cannot “swing” a vote. Christian radio existed under the old fairness doctrine — whatever makes you think it can’t be done fairly? Christian hate radio may have some difficulty. Good. It does no one any favor, especially Christians.

    But again, I note you attribute changes that cannot be made under law, by methods that are illegal or impossible.

    Regarding our economy … to me, it’s up for grabs just who will shove us over the cliff first … Bush-backed bailouts, congressional bailouts, Obama handouts, or congressional handouts. Future generations will look back in utter disgust at our current and upcoming government unless they STOP repeating the SAME mistakes that caused the Great Depression of ‘29.

    Where did you get off on that tangent?

    If you have the answer for the economy, please share. Alan Greenspan admitted that the assumptions he had been working under for the previous 60 years, which include the longest expansion in the history of the nation, were wrong. Are you smarter than Greenspan? Tell us the solutions.

    Cutting our national defense … maybe you need to hear Obama tell you himself. The following video is Obama … not a consummate imposter … telling us that he intends to defund and disarm our military particularly including technological advances.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fU4sVQV3Lhk

    Nothing in that video says he intends to “defund and disarm our military.” Maybe you’re one of those nuts who thinks that George Lucas’s Star Wars were real — but that’s a poor reason to continue throwing money after expensive, disproven technologies. Star Wars was one of the hugest errors of the Reagan administration, and it was stupid of Bush to revive it. Killing it would leave more money to do what President Carter did, build the military into the top equipped, top trained military in the world. The weapons that won Gulf War I were not Reagan’s Star Wars phantasms, but the hardware that President Carter had ordered. Sadly, we’re still functioning on the Carter technology. Obama understands that our fighting people need the best, and that Obi Wan Kenobi is not going to save our military at any price. You should realize that, too.

    Regarding tax cuts (alias taking from the financially succesful and donating the spoils to the less fortunate) …

    It beats taking from the poor to give to the rich, which is the system we have now. Obama proposes tax justice. There are a lot of millionaires running justifiably scared, but there are more who realize that a just and fair tax system is better for us all, ultimately. It’s the moral thing to do.

    Obama started at 250K … then he lowered it to 200K … then Biden lowered it to 150K.

    That’s pure fiction. Didn’t happen.

    But, let me ASSURE you that when you impose greater taxes on those who own businesses and the businesses themselves, two ordeals will unfold FORTHWITH. First, they will increase prices to the end-consumer for their products and services. Second, they will lay off employees to balance the books.

    Economists for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce always make that claim. They’ve never been able to back it up with real numbers. Oddly, Obama had greater support among people in that above-$250,000 income category than McCain. Justice appeals even to the very rich.

    In short, taking from the rich and giving to the poor may sound good on the surface. But, the reality is that the rich WILL survive while the higher prices and increased unemployment will cost FAR MORE than the stipends wrenched from the grip of the wealthy.

    Taking from the poor to give to the rich is exactly the system that prompted the Great Depression. Obama may be too late to save us on that score — the damage is so great. But morally, at least, it’s a better idea to make the rich pay their fair share and reduce the tax burden of the poor and near-poor, and middle class.

    Arthur Laffer also has never been able to provide numbers to back his Laffer Curve. As we saw in the past 8 years, Laffer was wrong.

    Ed Darrell, perhaps before you quaff your next big gulp of Obamalicious Kool-Aid, you could share with us the unbiased links online which validate that Obama was, in fact, vetted by the FBI.

    It’s called “standard Senate procedure.” Every Member of Congress gets checked for clearances before they’re sworn in. Not sure where you’ll find the procedure spelled out, but you might want to check the Rules Committees or the FBI’s organic law.

    It’s bizarre that you claim he’s got disqualifications, without a whit of evidence, and that you’re completely unaware of standard procedures that any common sense American would impose on our elected officials who deal with our nation’s secrets — and then you demand citations from me.

    But then, I don’t expect someone to use reason to give up a position not reached by reason.

    And, if you could be ever so kind as to share with … us here unlearnt right-wing nutjobs a clingin’ to our guns and bibles … what was Mr. Obama’s security clearance level before his candidacy announcement? What is it now? Keep it simple for us; we don’t have your laudable predilection for erudite study … ooops … i mean we’s not as smart and educated as you are in your brilliant nuanced insights.

    Don’t know why you’re so hard on yourself — unless that’s a confession. Obama’s a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. NATO is part of his charge, there. The Senate isn’t full of “unlearnt . . . nutjobs . . . not as smart and educated.” They aren’t stupid, and they don’t put senators into those positions if they can’t get clearance.

    I can’t tell you where I first learned that, but I knew it well years before I ever worked there.

    No nuance, just fact. As John Adams observed, facts are stubborn things.

  20. GeekGirl2u says:

    Have you gone to Wikipedia to look up the word “Obambo”?

    An obambo is a type of ghost among certain peoples of Central Africa.

    An obambo initially resides in the bush, but eventually gets tired of this and appears to a close relative, requesting that he build a house for him near his own. That night the village women are gathered to dance and sing, and next day the people visit the grave of the deceased and make a rough idol. They then erect a little hut near the house of the person the obambo visited, and put inside the bier on which the deceased was carried to his grave, as well as some of the dust from the grave. A white cloth is then draped over the door.

    An alternative meaning is the ghost of somebody who died in the bush and has no grave.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obambo

  21. paloma says:

    Ed Darrell and others like him:

    Re: Obambi, the reincarnation of FDR,Kennedy,Jesus,Lincoln, etc.

    senate foreign relations committee/so what ? You get in there as a senator.(more lower down)

    Constitution: spent his own money to get 2nd ammendment changed through 3rd party lobbyists & failed

    financial plans – he supported the CRA vigorously. blathers on about WIND (kills birds, need thousands of acres &tons of steel) blathers on about tax cuts

    competition in privatization will die. see: crumbling subways, bridges, etc.public schools rife with stupid social agendas need more ?

    hello – poor don’t support rich here. rich are greedy but basically poor support those even poorer with Obambi, lower middle class will support welfare mothers, health care we dont want cuz its not our choice
    and will not be adequate. service will be poor and disorganized like transport, schools, etc. my advice:learn herbology , go hiking and move out of the city or die in a city run hospital

    vetting: WE ALL KNOW about BHO and Alinsky, Odinga, New Party endorsement, Ayers, Rezko,Wright,Raines,Johnston,Davis,CAIR and Shariah law, Constitution”flawed”, PUHLEEZ !!etc.etc.etc.etc.etc.ad nauseum. if the stupid Senate accepted all this it dosn’t mean its right or AMERICAN, it means they were hung by their own noose and couldn’t PROVE anything.

    there isn’t any such thing as Christian hate radio. you just dont like their opinions. want hate? listen to Olbermann

    i think you need to research details about O’s attitudes toward the Armed Forces and his one world philosophy. also study history.

    btw, Reagan helped end the cold war.

    Black Liberation Theology a la Michelle is not appropriate for a leader. get ready to have Farrakhan unleashed full strength. already 15 ft. photos of DIDDY in Macys in NYC. Farrie’s next…he’s WAY cool.

    who cares when Rivera gets in. they will go after all dissent in due time because they want total control. so this is worse than the misdeeds of the past flawed repubs. lets not waterboard them but instead,set them loose on the American public ! did you see the whining article in the Daily News about the poor starving terrorist “suspect” arrested for plotting to BLOW UP JFK AIRPORT !!!!!!! wE SHOULD BE SORRY FOR HIM!!!HE ISN’T GETTING THREE SQUARES !!!!

    non brain dead of the world, unite !

    Oh, btw, there’s a new Thanksgiving Day balloon planned…….
    you guessed it………
    (actually it’s a SMURF, RELAX !!! ;D )

  22. Space Future says:

    You guys have redefined “brainwashed”.

    “I hope Hannity is aware of this!! He seems like the only honest media person willing to tell the facts like they are!!”

    You’re referring to Sean Hannity… From Fox News…

    *sigh*

    This is fun: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJE-pO9FapY

  23. So, Space Future … you completely avoided commenting on the content of this post.

    Do YOU believe it is RELEVANT that Obama was a member of the socialist New Party?

  24. Ed Darrell says:

    There’s not a shred of evidence that Obama was ever a “member” of the socialist New Party. Read the document. It says they endorsed him. It says they were happy he got elected. It says they spoke with him. It doesn’t say he was a member.

    Nor have you provided any evidence to suggest that, whatever it’s status, it would be considered a “communist” organization that might raise the hackles of the FBI. As a pragmatic matter, Obama has already been vetted by the FBI and Homeland Security. Obama doesn’t get the keys to the intelligence kingdom merely by election — he must be screened first, like everybody else. Especially since we know Obama was elected to the U.S. Senate after the World Trade Center attacks, after all security rules were tightened, you’d have to make a case that Obama was denied a security clearance as a starting point for claiming he is anything other than a flag-waving, Yankee Doodle Dandy, patriotic American.

    That case has not been made.

  25. Bwana says:

    Do all you Obama voters still feel you made the right choice?
    I hope America survives.
    I hope Obama fails.

  26. Ed Darrell says:

    Yep, right choice. I wonder if those who voted for Republican senators feel the same. Since January they’ve done everything they can to wreck the U.S. economy.

    Surely there is not a case to be made that McCain (“the economy is sound”) could have done better.

  27. alyans says:

    nice sharing..thanks..

  28. thanks for sharing. I bookmarked this post.

  29. dreadwolf says:

    I’d love to post a well thought-out comment exposing your astounding stupidity, but I just can’t as my brain is mortified by how moronic you are…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: